Code: | M.EM071 | Acronym: | D |
Keywords | |
---|---|
Classification | Keyword |
OFICIAL | Mechanical Engineering |
Active? | Yes |
Responsible unit: | Industrial Design Section |
Course/CS Responsible: | Master in Mechanical Engineering |
Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M.EM | 14 | Syllabus | 2 | - | 30 | 6,5 | 810 |
Teacher | Responsibility |
---|---|
José Duarte Ribeiro Marafona |
Tutorial Supervision: | 0,50 |
Type | Teacher | Classes | Hour |
---|---|---|---|
Tutorial Supervision | Totals | 15 | 7,50 |
José Joaquim da Mota Machado | 2,00 | ||
José Duarte Ribeiro Marafona | 0,50 | ||
Marco Paulo Lages Parente | 0,50 |
An individual project or research work aimed at the integration and application of knowledge and skills developed throughout the course related to the topics of General Mechnics.
The work will take place at FEUP, at an associated R&D Institution (e.g. INEGI) or any industrial environment, promoting the development of i) initiative; ii) decision-making and individual or group work capabilities; iii) the ability to analyse new situations; iv) skills to collect pertinent information/data; v) aptitudes to select appropriate methodologies to approach and solve the proposed problem; vi) the aptitude to summarize, extract conclusions and discuss results.
To develop in-depth knowledge on a given topic in the area of Materials and Manufacturing.
Computing Skills:
It depends on the topic of the dissertation work but may include the numerical simulation of technological processes and/or material mechanical behaviour.
Experimental Skills:
It depends on the topic of the dissertation work, but may include the experimental characterization of materials, or biologial tissues, and perform experimental setups.
Transversal Competencies:
Report writing
Public presentation and defence of the research
The content of the dissertation will depend on the chosen topic, which should be related to General Mechanics and may focus, among others, on one of the following topics:
In general, dissertation projects should involve the following tasks:
Teaching methodologies:
Type of Evaluation:
Assessment only with the final exam: presentation of the dissertation (20 minutes) followed by the discussion of the dissertation presented by the student (40 minutes, max.)
The different stages of the work in correspondence with the defined objectives, either theoretical and/or experimental, are developed in close connection with the respective supervisor. The relationship between the student and their supervisor(s), in addition to the formal times established, may involve frequent informal interactions, including visits or other actions, possibly outside the host institution. Each student is not only supported by their supervisor(s), but also by any other academic staff (teacher or technician).
The fact that students have to carry out the dissertation with only periodic meetings of work with the supervisor(s) during the semester, certainly promotes the development of initiative, decision-making and individual work capacities.
The nature of the work itself, as well as the periodic contact with the supervisors, allows the development of the capacity to analyse new situations and to collect pertinent information among other skills.
The fact that the evaluation focuses not only on the technical-scientific quality of the work but also on the quality of the dissertation document and on the quality of the presentation and the public discussion, promotes the ability to synthesize, draw conclusions and results discuss capabilities.
Designation | Weight (%) |
---|---|
Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese | 100,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
Designation | Time (hours) |
---|---|
Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese | 140,00 |
Estudo autónomo | 200,00 |
Trabalho de investigação | 470,00 |
Total: | 810,00 |
The frequency (admission to final exam) assumes the following:
The final classification will be calculated according to the following criteria and sub-criteria:
Technical-scientific quality of work: 50%
Quality of the dissertation document: 35%
Quality of presentation and public discussion: 15%